[vc_row][vc_column width=”1/1″][vc_column_text]The law of equitable easements has changed, and the impact may be substantial.[/vc_column_text][thb_gap height=”20″][vc_column_text] Read More
R.E.A.C.H. July 2009: Loss of Broker’s License for $100 Misdemeanor Conviction
[vc_row][vc_column width=”1/1″][vc_column_text]A real estate brokers’ license may be suspended or revoked by the Department of Real Estate based upon the broker’s conviction of a crime that is “substantially related to the qualifications, functions, or duties of the business or profession for which the license was issued.” In this issue, we discuss what is “substantially related.”[/vc_column_text][thb_gap height=”20″][vc_column_text] Read More
R.E.A.C.H. June 2009: Loss of Contractor’s License by Worker’s Compensation Fraud
[vc_row][vc_column width=”1/1″][vc_column_text]California’s Insurance Commissioner recently identified worker’s compensation fraud as a pervasive problem in the construction industry. But the risks of worker’s compensation fraud have increased substantially, and the practice may be curtailed significantly.[/vc_column_text][thb_gap height=”20″][vc_column_text] Read More
R.E.A.C.H. May 2009: No Lis Pendens in Arbitration
[vc_row][vc_column width=”1/1″][vc_column_text]The court of appeal has held that an arbitration is not an “action” that will support the recording of a lis pendens on title to real property.[/vc_column_text][thb_gap height=”20″][vc_column_text] Read More
R.E.A.C.H. March 2009: Unlicensed Contractors Work for Free
[vc_row][vc_column width=”1/1″][vc_column_text]The California Supreme Court decided a case with far‐reaching implications in the construction industry, holding that a contractor unlicensed for even a small portion of a large job cannot get paid for any part of that job. The decision may have national impact.[/vc_column_text][thb_gap height=”20″][vc_column_text] Read More
R.E.A.C.H. February 2009: Enforceable Option Agreements
[vc_row][vc_column width=”1/1″][vc_column_text]
THIS ISSUE: In September 2007, we reported on a court of appeal decision holding that an option purchase agreement in a residential lease was unenforceable because it was too uncertain. Recently, however, the California Supreme Court has reversed that decision, finding that even though the option was not perfect, it was nevertheless sufficiently certain to be enforced.
[/vc_column_text][thb_gap height=”20″][vc_column_text] Read More
R.E.A.C.H. January 2009: Property Owner Protection from Tenant Mechanic’s Liens
[vc_row][vc_column width=”1/1″][vc_column_text]
THIS ISSUE: Commercial property tenant improvements can be costly. In an economic environment where tenants may be financially uncertain, can property owners protect themselves from mechanic’s liens relating to those tenant improvements?
[/vc_column_text][thb_gap height=”20″][vc_column_text] Read More
R.E.A.C.H. December 2008: Exclusive Use Easements
[vc_row][vc_column width=”1/1″][vc_column_text]
THIS ISSUE: Typically, courts do not interpret an easement as an “exclusive use” right in land, since such a use would preclude all others – including the owner of the land – from using it. But one recent case held that the clear language of a granted easement created just such an exclusive use right, entitling the easement holders to use the land without interference of any kind from anyone, including the fee owners of the land.
[/vc_column_text][thb_gap height=”20″][vc_column_text] Read More
R.E.A.C.H. November 2008: Guarantor Risks After Foreclosure
[vc_row][vc_column width=”1/1″][vc_column_text]
THIS ISSUE: The California Court of Appeal recently held that some guarantors may be liable for a loan deficiency judgment after a foreclosure sale on real property, while others may not.1 The decision follows long California precedent, but may be ripe for legislative review regarding the inherent risks in personal guaranties during a real estate foreclosure.
[/vc_column_text][thb_gap height=”20″][vc_column_text] Read More
R.E.A.C.H. October 2008: Easements Extinguished by Merger
[vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]reach_1008[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column width=”1/1″][vc_column_text]
THIS ISSUE: One person’s ownership of two parcels of land will extinguish easements benefitting either of the parcels through the process of “merger.” But what happens when the parcels are owned by multiple parties?
[/vc_column_text][thb_gap height=”20″][vc_column_text] Read More